Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Willie Miller: SFA should tread carefully with O’Neill deal

Michael O'Neill.
Michael O'Neill.

My view on the Scotland manager’s job is the same, whether it goes to Michael O’Neill or Jose Mourinho – it should be a two-year contract.

The boss’ position should be up for review at the end of each qualifying campaign.

Too often, as with Gordon Strachan, they have been given another go at qualifying for a major tournament after failure.

It appears unlikely a sensible two-year, one-campaign deal will be the case this time around.

O’Neill is the only candidate for the job the Scottish Football Association have named, which I think is a mistake from the governing body.

Whether or not he is the right man for the job in footballing terms, the Northern Ireland gaffer now holds all the cards.

He’s been offered a lucrative four-year contract extension by the Irish FA, so, if the SFA want to secure his services, which they obviously do – desperately – they’re going to have to make him a bumper offer.

Will this offer take the form of a big salary – some reports suggest £500,000 a year, which would make him Scotland’s best paid manager ever – and a longer contract?

Once you factor in O’Neill’s alleged demands to take in his own backroom staff, this deal would put the SFA in one hell of a bind.

They must tread extremely carefully, because if it turns out after a year or two O’Neill is the wrong fit for the national team, it could take an enormous amount of cash to get rid of him.

To my mind, it would have been more sensible to offer a two-year deal to an out-of-work manager, like Paul Lambert or Alex McLeish.

That’s where I think they should have been looking.

History has told us the SFA’s “right” candidate, the one who seems a good fit like O’Neill, is usually not right for the job.

The SFA should have, if nothing else, taken the less risky route.

This article originally appeared on the Evening Express website. For more information, read about our new combined website.