Sir Ian’s £50m pledge for city
Sir Ian Wood’s offer to raise Aberdeen’s Union Terrace Gardens
Published:
OIL TYCOON Sir Ian Wood today pledged £50 million of his own money to give Aberdeen a new heart.
The businessman wants to raise Aberdeen’s Union Terrace Gardens to street level and create a civic square.
Sir Ian Wood today said the scheme would only go ahead if they could physically do it, if it was backed by the people of the North-east and received “significant” public funding.
He said: “The goal is to give Aberdeen a vibrant new heart to reflect both the success of the region and its position as a leading Northern European city.
“I personally believe it has the potential to transform our city and could be one of the major developments of the 21st century.”
The Wood Group chairman’s vision was unveiled at The Foyer in Aberdeen attended by the country’s leader Alex Salmond.
It would see the gardens covered over as well as the adjacent railway line and Denburn dual carriageway, linking Union Street, Union Terrace, Rosemount Viaduct and Belmont Street.
Sir Ian said: “The new heart should be an open leisure and recreational area with significant green landscaping, possible water features and certainly year-round cultural activities, including leisure and arts facilities and some all-weather facilities.
“Like many of the outstanding city centre squares in Europe, it could aim to host major events such as concerts, street theatre, ice-skating and seasonal displays and exhibits.”
First Minister Mr Salmond said: “It strikes me that in these tough economic times there is all the more reason to think big for the future of the North-east of Scotland.
“We should be excited by the scale of his vision and his commitment to ensure great things can be made to happen.”
A study funded by Scottish Enterprise – expected to be completed in March next year – will look at the feasibility, design and cost.
It will also consider raising only the area of the Gardens, and at improving the existing site, but neither of these plans would receive backing from Sir Ian.
Sir Ian said he was looking for “significant” funding from the public sector. He said: “With regard to the public sector funding, this will be a five-year project and when the costs are known, provided they are within a reasonable budget, discussions will take place with a range of public sector sources, as well as possible private sector participants.”
Mr Salmond said the Scottish Government was not in a position to discuss funding until the results of the feasibility study was completed and costings were known.
However, he added: “Such a project would have an extremely strong case of going forward to seek public funding, not just from the city council but from the Scottish Government and from the identifiable Lottery fundings which are available for such major projects.”
The square would link with the planned pedestrianisation of Union Street.
Sir Ian said: “The square will effectively integrate the Union Street retail and business thoroughfare with the cultural heart of His Majesty’s Theatre and the Art Gallery and this is a critical element of the proposal.
“Significant space will be created both within and below the new square for a range of social, leisure, cultural and commercial activities all year round. There is also the opportunity to explore the potential for direct rail and bus transport links from the lower levels into the square.”
He added: “I am only prepared to provide up to £50 million if it has strong support from the people of Aberdeen and the North-east of Scotland.
“I see this as the ‘people’s’ square with something for everyone, and how that square will be developed, both above and below ground, is open to public debate – but I personally don’t see significant building above-ground or significant car parking underground.”
Sir Ian warned that if the costs were above £100 million it would be “very difficult” to make it happen.
But he added that there had been a “positive” response to the concept from colleagues in the energy industry.
The Gardens are currently earmarked as the base for the £13 million Peacock Visual Arts Contemporary Arts Centre, which would be offered a home in the new square.
But a Peacock spokesman said Sir Ian’s announcement put its plans in jeopardy.
“A delay in proceeding will likely mean that we will lose our design team, architect and campaign team,” he said. “There would be immediate redundancies at Peacock.”
Any revamp would be led by the Aberdeen City and Shire Economic Future.
Chairman Tom Smith said: “Today, we have an example of the private sector putting its money where its mouth is.”
Aberdeen City Council leader Kate Dean said: “For the first time we now have the prospect of significant private sector financing, which has never been on the table before.”
What do you think of the scheme?










Readers' Comments
Great gesture by Sir Ian - does he not fancy redirecting £10 million down to Pittodrie though?! :-)
Keith Middleton
Report this comment
Well done Sir Ian, but just do the project yourself as Aberdeen council would make a mess of it and squander most of the money on consultants. How about turning the Torry battery into a sea life centre, or something else. As its just a mess at the moment.
Steven Thomson
Report this comment
Its a shame that Iain Wood did not take into account the time money and effort put into the Peacock visual arts development that has been already been proposed and has already secured 70% of its £9.5 million project. I sincerely hope Sir Ian aims to work in conjunction with this development otherwise a lot of good time, work and money will have been wasted.
Nick Aitken
Report this comment
Seems like there's more pressing concerns than a civic square with 60 teachers threatened with redundancy, the only pool with a diving board closed and the ice rink shut. Council already has there own monument to stupidity in Marischal College.
Alan Craigie
Report this comment
Well done Sir Ian. There will always be knockers but this is just what the centre of Aberdeen needs, a focal point with a tidy up of the surrounding buildings to show it off and an underground car park below accessed from the Denburn dual carriageway. All we need now is a competition for civically minded architects to offer their services free of charge to design the square. Aberdeen City Council's involvement should be strictly limited to granting planning permission with minimum fuss.
David Eunson
Report this comment
A fantastic gesture however could the funding not be diverted to creating such a feature on the area currently covered by St Nicholas House? When the council move to Marischal College (ignoring the arguments for and against this here) a private investment of this nature would free up council expenditure to invest in other services etc (dig them out of the hole they are in) whilst still providing the people of the city with a fantastic civic square. To develop Union Terrace gardens in this way would potentially see us with 2 similarly organised areas - Union Terrace and the former St Nicholas House site - do we need this? Preserving the gardens as they are, albeit with additional investment such as the Peacock development, would provide 2 different sites to be enjoyed.
Buford T Justice
Report this comment
Hands off Union Terrace gardens they are unique to this City. Spend some of the money to bring them back to former glory. Also use some of the money to get the great Uptown Baths up and running again. There used to be nothing better than walking past the Gardens on a summer evening and seeing all the blooms out and someone playing music.
Colin Walker
Report this comment
I agree Colin well said, they should also be well lit up at night so that people can use it, rather than it being a haven for all sort of weirdos. make it family friendly, bring back the giant chess the bandstand, and allow local bands to perform free of charge, during the evenings and at weekends. I am not all that happy with an art centre, especially when we have a huge one beside the gardens already.
Steven Thomson
Report this comment
Will this cost the city council more or less than the £3m committed to the existing arts centre project? It would seem likely to cost a great deal more if Sir Ian Wood is looking to invest £50m - generally philanthropy will amount to less than half the value of any given project like this. Regardless of the comparative merits (and how creating a "civic square" - that will presumably accelerate the decline of Castelgate to boot - improves the city is beyond me, particularly given that it will lose the city the £9m already raised for the impressive arts centre project in UTG), does the city council have a secret stash of extra money for when wealthy folk come calling?
Ellis Croft
Report this comment
Sir Ian is holding the city to ransom and knowingly scuppering the new arts centre project. Get real folks, he expects his investment (don't call it a gift) to be matched from our own pockets. He also expects to retain final say over what goes into this space... and of course he will want to own the lease on the many retail properties that are bound to rise up where this green tranquil oasis once stood. Just what the city need eh? If Sir Ian is genuine in his claims of wanting to reinvigorate the city centre, he could do so for a fraction of the cost by assisting some of the schools and charities affected by the mismanagement of ACC and donating the remaining £4 million that Peacock needs to seal the deal on the art centre. His motives are most suspect and further evidence of the city councils and local press' willingness to roll over for Big Business in sheeps clothing.
Jo Butler
Report this comment
I know Ian Wood has been a great benefactor to the people of Aberdeen and has seen through many successful investments. But it seems that the Scottish government are yet again being blinded by the glitter of money. Ian Wood’s proposal sounds vague and poorly organised with many avenues to failure. How disappointing that this hastily conceived, money driven suggestion may unravel years of careful planning and fundraising by the team at Peacock Visual Arts.
Natalie Farrell
Report this comment
The statement that, “The new heart should be an open leisure and recreational area with significant green landscaping, possible water features and certainly year-round cultural activities, including leisure and arts facilities and some all-weather facilities” is a bitter pill to swallow following the closure of many cherished community leisure facilities earlier this year. When will Aberdeen council and Alex Salmond stop playing the greedy lapdog to rich tycoons wanting to buy themselves a ‘legacy’ on our land? And on that note, when did it become acceptable to sidestep the democratic process in Scotland? The council should start thinking about what’s best for the community. Do we really want £50 million of our taxes paying into an unidentified project or £3 million of it going into the well defined, existing project proposed by PVA.
Mark Fraser
Report this comment
As a supporter of Peacock Visual Arts I'm bitterly disappointed that once again Aberdeen council are seeing pound signs. I don't believe for one second that Ian Wood is doing this out of the kindness of his heart. PVA have spent years planning, campaigning and fundraising to develop the new arts centre in Aberdeen and to see a greedy oilman waltz in and attempt to snatch it away is heartbreaking.
Iain Kay
Report this comment
Yay!Bring on more NEXT,Nero and Beefeater chains! And a square the size of Union Terrace gardens!Great we can all sit outside in this square drinking our industrial sized cups of coffee through our chattering teeth!How would this benefit Aberdeen exactly?I dont think people will visit Aberdeen to see this square!And lets face it we dont get visitors for the shopping or leisure experience!Aberdeen needs more interesing things to do and see apart from eating,drinking and shopping!The other day at work we helped two Dutch visitors change their allocated flight back home cos they were at a lose end and didnt want to stay in Aberdeen any longer!Me and my colleague TRIED to list things to see/visit in the city centre, and erm apart from the Maritime Museum, the Art Gallery and Marshical College what else is there??And if the council does make the cut back iv read about in the press then they will probably be closing!I think its cheeky, and, well rude actually of Sir Ian Wood to propose this when there is already a project in place for that site.All they need is a little bit more funding; Sir Wood why dont you invest in that instead?..................Actually,maybe not!
jane gore
Report this comment
The Evening Express is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.
However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.
Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.
We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.